Benchmark: Native vs Lodash.js contains / fork

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var max1 = 100000; // 100,000 (100 Thousand)
var max2 = 10000000; // 10,000,000 (10 Million)
var max3 = 100000000;

var arr1 = [];
//for (var i = 0; i <= max1; i++) { arr1.push(i); }

var arr2 = [];
for (var i = 0; i <= max2; i++) { arr2.push(i); }

var arr3 = [];
for (var i = 0; i <= max3; i++) { arr3.push(i); }

Tests:

Native_include
arr2.includes(-100000);
Native_index of
arr2.indexOf(-100000);
lodash
_.includes(arr2, -100000);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Native_include
Native_index of
lodash

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:77.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/77.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 77 on Ubuntu

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Native_include	51.8 Ops/sec
Native_index of	60.1 Ops/sec
lodash	53.6 Ops/sec

Native vs Lodash.js contains / fork (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Native_include vs Native_index of vs lodash

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Native_include

Native_index of

lodash

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A