Benchmark: forEach vs forOwn

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var anlagenStatus = Object.assign({}, _.range(10000).map((i) => ({
  status: `status_${i}`,
  statusDateneingang: `statusDateneingang_${i}`,
})));

Tests:

Array.prototype.forEach()
const anlagenStatusKeys = Object.keys(anlagenStatus); anlagenStatusKeys.forEach(function (anlagenStatusKey) { console.log(anlagenStatusKey); console.log(anlagenStatus[anlagenStatusKey].status); console.log(anlagenStatus[anlagenStatusKey].statusDateneingang); });
_.forOwn()
_.forOwn(anlagenStatus, ({ status, statusDateneingang }, systemId) => { console.log(systemId); console.log(status); console.log(statusDateneingang); });

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Array.prototype.forEach()
_.forOwn()

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON and benchmark data to understand what's being tested.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark compares two different ways of iterating over an object: `Array.prototype.forEach()` and `_._forOwn()`. The goal is to determine which method is more efficient.

**Options Compared**

There are two options being compared:

1. **`Array.prototype.forEach()`**: This is a built-in JavaScript method that iterates over an array (or any other iterable) using a callback function.
2. **`_.forOwn()`**: This is a function from the Lodash library, which provides a way to iterate over an object using a callback function.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **`Array.prototype.forEach()`**:
	* Pros:
		+ Built-in JavaScript method, so no additional library dependencies.
		+ Can be used with arrays or any other iterable.
		+ Simple syntax.
	* Cons:
		+ Not optimized for object iteration, which can lead to slower performance compared to specialized object iteration methods.
2. **`_.forOwn()`**:
	* Pros:
		+ Optimized for object iteration, making it faster than `Array.prototype.forEach()`.
		+ Provides a way to access both the key and value of each property in the iteration.
	* Cons:
		+ Requires the Lodash library, which can add overhead due to its size and complexity.
		+ Syntax may be unfamiliar to some developers.

**Library Usage**

In this benchmark, the `_.forOwn()` function is used from the Lodash library. The library provides a convenient way to iterate over objects using a callback function, making it easier to write efficient code for object iteration.

**Other Considerations**

* **Context**: The benchmark is run in a Chrome browser on a Linux desktop machine.
* **Performance**: The `Array.prototype.forEach()` method performs slightly better than the `_.forOwn()` method, with an execution rate of approximately 5.758 executions per second compared to 5.240 executions per second.

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives for iterating over objects in JavaScript include:

1. **`Object.keys()` and `forEach()`**: While not optimized for object iteration like `_.forOwn()`, this approach can still be effective using the built-in `Object.keys()` method to get an array of property names, followed by a `forEach()` loop.
2. **`.every()` or `.some()`**: These methods are designed for iterating over objects and arrays, but they may not provide direct access to the key-value pairs like `_.forOwn()`.
3. **Custom iteration loops**: Developers can write their own custom iteration loops using `for` loops, `while` loops, or even recursive functions.

In summary, while both methods have their pros and cons, the `Array.prototype.forEach()` method is a built-in JavaScript method that may not be optimized for object iteration, whereas the `_.forOwn()` function from Lodash provides an optimized way to iterate over objects using a callback function.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 127 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Array.prototype.forEach()	5.8 Ops/sec
_.forOwn()	5.2 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

forEach vs forOwn (version: 0)

Compare different ways of iterating over an object

Comparing performance of: Array.prototype.forEach() vs _.forOwn()

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Array.prototype.forEach()

_.forOwn()

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):