var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]
var other = [ 1, 2, params ]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | |
spread operator |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | 5953688.5 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 22723450.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares two approaches for merging arrays in JavaScript: Array.prototype.concat()
and the new ES6 spread operator (...
). The goal is to determine which approach is faster and more efficient.
Test Cases
There are two individual test cases:
Array.prototype.concat
: This test case uses the traditional concat()
method to merge an array with another array containing a variable number of elements....
): This test case uses the spread operator to merge an array with another array containing a variable number of elements.Options Compared
The two options being compared are:
Array.prototype.concat()
: A traditional method for merging arrays, which involves creating a new array and adding each element from the first array to the second array....
): A new syntax introduced in ES6 that allows for more concise merging of arrays.Pros and Cons
Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:
Array.prototype.concat()
:...
)Library Used
None. This benchmark doesn't use any external libraries beyond the standard JavaScript library.
Special JS Features/Syntax
The spread operator (...
) is a new syntax introduced in ES6, which allows for more concise merging of arrays. It's also used as a rest parameter in function definitions, but that's not relevant to this benchmark.
Benchmark Preparation Code and HTML Preparation Code
The provided Script Preparation Code
and Html Preparation Code
are empty, indicating that no additional setup is required for the benchmark.
Other Alternatives
If you were to write your own benchmark, you might consider using other approaches or variations, such as:
Array.prototype.push()
instead of concat()
Array.prototype.splice()
instead of concat()
Keep in mind that the benchmark is designed to test specific scenarios, so it's essential to tailor your own benchmarking approach to your specific use case.