Benchmark: underscor _.sortBy() vs underscor _.sortBy()

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/underscore.js/1.8.3/underscore-min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

window.users = [
  { name: 'Ваня', level: '3' },
  { name: 'Саша', level: '1' },
  { name: 'Маша', level: '2' },
  { name: 'Ника', level: '3' },
  { name: 'Вера', level: '1' },
  { name: 'Саша', level: '2' },
  { name: 'Ваня', level: '2' }
];

Tests:

Underscore sortBy()
_.sortBy(users, 'name')
Under2score sortBy()
_.sortBy(users, 'name')

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Underscore sortBy()
Under2score sortBy()

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/69.0.3497.100 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 69 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Underscore sortBy()	546328.4 Ops/sec
Under2score sortBy()	566532.8 Ops/sec

underscor _.sortBy() vs underscor _.sortBy() (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Underscore sortBy() vs Under2score sortBy()

Created: 5 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Underscore sortBy()

Under2score sortBy()

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A