Benchmark: vanilla vs jquery test 2

HTML Preparation code:

<div class="test-wrapper">
<div class="test test-class"></div>
</div>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>

Tests:

Get element by class - Vanilla
document.querySelector(".test");
Get element by class - JQuery
$(document).find(".test");
Add class - Vanilla
document.querySelector(".test").classList.add("test-add");
Add class - JQuery
$(document).find(".test").addClass("test-add");
Remove class - Vanilla
document.querySelector(".test").classList.remove("test-class");
Remove class - JQuery
$(document).find(".test").removeClass("test-class");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Get element by class - Vanilla
Get element by class - JQuery
Add class - Vanilla
Add class - JQuery
Remove class - Vanilla
Remove class - JQuery

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and its components.

**Benchmark Definition:**

The benchmark is defined by two main parts:

1. **Script Preparation Code:** This code is executed once, before running each test case. In this case, it loads the jQuery library from a CDN (Content Delivery Network). The purpose of this code is to ensure that both vanilla JavaScript and jQuery are available for comparison.
2. **Html Preparation Code:** This code is used to create a basic HTML structure with a single element, `.test`, which will be used as the target element for each test case.

**Individual Test Cases:**

There are six test cases, each measuring a different aspect of performance between vanilla JavaScript and jQuery:

1. **Get Element by Class - Vanilla:** This test measures how fast it can retrieve an element using its class name.
2. **Get Element by Class - JQuery:** This test measures how fast it can retrieve an element using its class name with jQuery.
3. **Add Class - Vanilla:** This test measures how fast it can add a new class to an element.
4. **Add Class - JQuery:** This test measures how fast it can add a new class to an element using jQuery.
5. **Remove Class - Vanilla:** This test measures how fast it can remove a specific class from an element.
6. **Remove Class - JQuery:** This test measures how fast it can remove a specific class from an element using jQuery.

**Library Used:**

In this benchmark, jQuery is used as the library for comparison with vanilla JavaScript. The purpose of jQuery is to provide a simpler and more convenient way to manipulate HTML documents, compared to vanilla JavaScript.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax:**

None of the test cases use any special JavaScript features or syntax that requires specific explanation.

**Pros and Cons of Different Approaches:**

Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of using jQuery versus vanilla JavaScript for each test case:

1. **Get Element by Class:**
	* Vanilla JavaScript:
		+ Pros: Faster execution, less overhead.
		+ Cons: More code required to retrieve element by class.
	* jQuery:
		+ Pros: Simpler syntax, easier to use.
		+ Cons: Slower execution due to additional overhead.
2. **Add Class and Remove Class:**
	* Vanilla JavaScript:
		+ Pros: Faster execution, less overhead.
		+ Cons: More code required to add and remove classes.
	* jQuery:
		+ Pros: Simpler syntax, easier to use.
		+ Cons: Slower execution due to additional overhead.

**Other Alternatives:**

If you wanted to measure the performance of other JavaScript libraries or alternatives, such as:

1. **Lodash:** A popular utility library that can be used for similar tasks (e.g., `_.get(element, 'class')`).
2. **VanillaJS alternatives:** Other JavaScript libraries that aim to provide a more efficient and convenient way to perform DOM manipulation tasks.
3. **Modern JavaScript features:** Newer JavaScript features like `DOMParser`, `CSSOM`, or modern browsers' built-in APIs (e.g., `Element.prototype.classList`) can also be used for similar tasks.

Keep in mind that each of these alternatives would require modifications to the benchmark definition and test cases, as well as additional analysis to determine their performance characteristics.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/70.0.3538.110 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 70 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Get element by class - Vanilla	2468742.5 Ops/sec
Get element by class - JQuery	373015.8 Ops/sec
Add class - Vanilla	936521.0 Ops/sec
Add class - JQuery	186312.1 Ops/sec
Remove class - Vanilla	983739.6 Ops/sec
Remove class - JQuery	206023.4 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

vanilla vs jquery test 2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Get element by class - Vanilla vs Get element by class - JQuery vs Add class - Vanilla vs Add class - JQuery vs Remove class - Vanilla vs Remove class - JQuery

Created: 6 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Get element by class - Vanilla

Get element by class - JQuery

Add class - Vanilla

Add class - JQuery

Remove class - Vanilla

Remove class - JQuery

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):