var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 };
var other = Object.assign({ b: params.b, c: params.c, d: params.d });
var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 };
var other = { b: params.b, c: params.c, d: params.d };
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Object.assign | |
default object |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Object.assign | 17287636.0 Ops/sec |
default object | 77099856.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested.
What is being tested?
MeasureThat.net is testing two approaches for creating objects in JavaScript: Object.assign()
and the spread operator (also known as destructuring assignment).
The benchmark compares the performance of these two methods on a simple object creation task. The test creates an object with three properties (b
, c
, and d
) and then assigns it to another variable using either Object.assign()
or the spread operator.
Options compared
There are only two options being compared:
Object.assign()
: This method takes an existing object as the target and assigns new key-value pairs to it.Object.assign()
.Pros and Cons of each approach:
Object.assign():
Pros:
Cons:
Default object creation:
Pros:
Object.assign()
Cons:
Other considerations:
Object.assign()
with non-object arguments or when the target object does not support assignment.Library and its purpose (if used): None of the test cases explicitly use a library, so no libraries are mentioned.
Special JS feature or syntax: The spread operator is being tested, which is a relatively modern JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015. It allows for concise object creation using the ...
operator.
Now that we've broken down the benchmark, let's look at some alternative approaches:
Object.assign()
, such as using the Object.create()
method.Keep in mind that these alternatives are not part of the original benchmark, but they might be interesting variants to consider when exploring object creation and assignment in JavaScript.