<div class="test"></div>
document.querySelectorAll(".test")
document.getElementsByClassName(".test")
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
querySelectorAll | |
getElementsByClassName |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
querySelectorAll | 2230294.2 Ops/sec |
getElementsByClassName | 9241237.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros and cons of each approach.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares two DOM querying methods: document.querySelectorAll()
and document.getElementsByClassName()
. The test aims to determine which method is faster for a given HTML structure.
Library and Functionality
In this benchmark, we have:
document.querySelectorAll()
: This method returns a NodeList of all elements that match the specified CSS selector.document.getElementsByClassName()
: This method returns an HTMLCollection (a collection of nodes) containing all elements with the specified class name.Both methods are part of the DOM API and allow developers to dynamically select elements based on their structure in the HTML document.
Comparison Options
The benchmark compares two comparison options:
document.querySelectorAll()
vs. document.getElementsByClassName()
. This option tests whether the performance difference between these two similar methods is significant.document.querySelector()
instead of document.querySelectorAll()
or getElementsByClassName()
. However, this comparison option is not explicitly mentioned in the provided benchmark definition json.Pros and Cons
document.querySelector()
instead of querySelectorAll()
or getElementsByClassName()
. This comparison option is not explicitly mentioned in the provided benchmark definition json.Special Considerations
In this benchmark, no special JavaScript features or syntax are being tested beyond the standard DOM API methods.
Other Alternatives
If you want to explore alternative methods for selecting elements, consider using other libraries like jQuery or vanilla JavaScript alternatives like Array.prototype.filter()
and String.prototype.indexOf()
. However, these approaches might not be as efficient as native DOM querying methods in most cases.
For example, with jQuery, the equivalent tests would look like this:
// Using jQuery's selectors
$(document).find('.test').length;
Or, using vanilla JavaScript:
// Vanilla JavaScript alternative
const elements = document.querySelectorAll('.test');
elements.length;
Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics compared to the native DOM API methods.
Overall, the provided benchmark provides a good starting point for comparing the performance of document.querySelectorAll()
and document.getElementsByClassName()
. However, considering additional test cases or exploring other querying methods can help developers better understand their options and make informed decisions about their code.