var arr = ['1', '2', '3'];
var x;
arr.forEach(function(item) {
x = item * 10;
});
var x;
arr.forEach(function(item, index, array) {
// index && item not used
x = item * 10;
});
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
forEach(item) ... | |
forEach(function(item, index, array) ... |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
forEach(item) ... | 8035538.5 Ops/sec |
forEach(function(item, index, array) ... | 7687259.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to help you understand the JavaScript microbenchmarking test on MeasureThat.net.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark tests two approaches of using the forEach
method in JavaScript:
arr.forEach(function(item) { ... })
arr.forEach(function(item, index, array) { ... })
The goal is to measure the performance penalty when using the second approach with an additional index
parameter.
Options Compared
The two options compared are:
forEach
with only one argument (i.e., item
)forEach
with three arguments (i.e., item
, index
, and array
)Pros and Cons of Each Approach
forEach
with one argument (item
):forEach
with three arguments (item
, index
, and array
):Library Used
The forEach
method is a built-in JavaScript function. The purpose of forEach
is to execute a callback function on each element of an array.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There is no special feature or syntax mentioned in this benchmark that requires special consideration. However, it's worth noting that using forEach
with three arguments can lead to additional overhead due to the need to pass the index and array references as separate arguments.
Other Considerations
When comparing the performance of these two approaches, other factors should be considered, such as:
forEach
differently.Alternative Benchmarks
Other microbenchmarks that might be relevant to this one include:
for
loop vs. forEach
map
, filter
, and reduce
methodsKeep in mind that the specific benchmarking approach may depend on the use case and requirements of your project.