var array = ['banana', 'sausage', 'jesus']
array.indexOf('sausage') !== 1
array.includes('sausage')
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
IndexOf | |
Includes |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
IndexOf | 28801114.0 Ops/sec |
Includes | 29806706.0 Ops/sec |
Benchmark Explanation
The provided benchmark measures the performance difference between indexOf
and includes
methods in JavaScript, which are used to search for a specific value within an array.
Options Compared:
Two options are compared:
indexOf
method: The indexOf
method returns the index of the first occurrence of the specified value within the array, or -1 if the value is not found.includes
method: The includes
method returns a boolean value indicating whether the array includes the specified value.Pros and Cons:
indexOf
method: Pros:includes
method: Pros:indexOf
because it needs to scan through the entire array.Library and Purpose:
There are no libraries explicitly mentioned in the provided benchmark definition or test cases. However, both methods (indexOf
and includes
) are native JavaScript methods that don't require any external libraries for their implementation.
Special JS Feature/Syntax:
There is a special syntax used in the includes
method. The includes()
method introduces a new way to perform array searching using a more intuitive and concise syntax, which can improve readability and performance in certain scenarios.
Benchmark Preparation Code:
The provided JavaScript code creates an array with three elements: "banana", "sausage", and "jesus". This is used as the input for both indexOf
and includes
methods to measure their performance.
Other Alternatives:
Alternative methods or approaches could include:
forEach()
or every()
, which might be faster or more suitable for certain use cases.Keep in mind that these alternatives would require additional code and potentially different benchmarking strategies.