const input = 'ten';
switch(input) {
case 'one':
return true;
case 'two':
return true;
case 'three':
return true;
case 'four':
return true;
case 'five':
return true;
case 'six':
return true;
case 'seven':
return true;
case 'eight':
return true;
case 'nine':
return true;
case 'ten':
return true;
}
const input = 'ten';
const LUT = {
zero: true,
one: true,
two: true,
three: true,
four: true,
five: true,
six: true,
seven: true,
eight: true,
nine: true,
ten: true
}
LUT[input];
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Switch | |
Map |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Switch | 740983232.0 Ops/sec |
Map | 768123328.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark consists of two test cases: Switch
and Map
. Both tests measure the performance of different approaches to check if a string value matches one of several predefined values.
Options Compared
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Switch Statement
Pros:
Cons:
Array Lookup (Map)
Pros:
Cons:
Library Used
In both test cases, no specific JavaScript library is used. The switch statement is a built-in JavaScript construct, while the array lookup approach uses an object literal (LUT).
Special JS Feature or Syntax
None of these approaches rely on special JavaScript features or syntax.
Other Considerations
When choosing between these two approaches, consider the following factors:
Alternatives
Other approaches that might be used for this type of benchmark include:
Object.create()
or a third-party library like Lodash's isEqual()
function)However, these alternatives are not explicitly mentioned in the provided benchmark definition.