Benchmark: GBCR Sequential Intense

Script Preparation code:

function createEl() {
  const el = document.createElement('div');
  el.style.width = 100;
  el.style.height = 100;
  el.style.position = 'relative';
  el.style.x = 10;
  el.style.y = 10;
  return el;
}

const els = [... new Array(100)].map(() => createEl());
window.els = els;
els.forEach(el => document.body.appendChild(el));

Tests:

control
console.log('const');
gbcr one
console.log('const'); window.els[0].getBoundingClientRect();
gbcr all
console.log('const'); window.els.forEach(el => el.getBoundingClientRect());

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
control
gbcr one
gbcr all

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/69.0.3497.100 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 69 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
control	235965.0 Ops/sec
gbcr one	118515.4 Ops/sec
gbcr all	6119.7 Ops/sec

GBCR Sequential Intense (version: 0)

Test the performance of getBoundingClientRect sequential calls.

Comparing performance of: control vs gbcr one vs gbcr all

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

control

gbcr one

gbcr all

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A