Benchmark: else vs continue vs short if

Tests:

else
let array = []; for (let i = 2000000; i > 0; i--) { if (i % 2) { array.push(1); } else { array.push(2); } }
continue
let array = []; for (let i = 2000000; i > 0; i--) { if (i % 2) { array.push(1); continue; } array.push(2) }
short if
let array = []; for (let i = 2000000; i > 0; i--) { array.push(i % 2 ? 1 : 2); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
else
continue
short if

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 23 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark is called "else vs continue vs short if", which implies that it compares three different approaches to iterate over an array and push elements onto it based on certain conditions.

**Test Cases**

There are three individual test cases:

1. **"else"`: This test case uses a traditional `if-else` statement to check if the current number is even or odd, and pushes either 1 or 2 onto the array accordingly.
2. **"continue"`: In this test case, after pushing an element onto the array, the loop continues with the next iteration using the `continue` keyword. If the current number is even, it will be pushed onto the array, but then the loop will continue to the next iteration and check the next number.
3. **"short if"`: This test case uses a conditional operator (`i % 2 ? 1 : 2`) to determine which value to push onto the array in a single statement.

**Library and Special Features**

None of the test cases use any libraries or special JavaScript features beyond basic syntax and control structures (e.g., `for` loop, `if-else`, `continue`).

**Options Compared**

The three options being compared are:

* **Traditional `if-else`**: Using a separate `if` statement to check if the current number is even or odd.
* **Using `continue`**: After pushing an element onto the array, using the `continue` keyword to skip the rest of the loop body and move on to the next iteration.
* **Short conditional operator**: Using a single conditional expression (`i % 2 ? 1 : 2`) to determine which value to push onto the array.

**Pros and Cons**

Here are some pros and cons for each approach:

* **Traditional `if-else`**:
	+ Pros: Easy to read and understand, clear intention.
	+ Cons: May be slower due to the additional branch prediction overhead.
* **Using `continue`**:
	+ Pros: Can lead to faster loop execution, as the CPU can predict which branch will be taken more accurately.
	+ Cons: May make the code harder to read and understand for some people.
* **Short conditional operator**:
	+ Pros: Often faster than traditional `if-else`, as it avoids branch prediction overhead.
	+ Cons: May require some mental gymnastics to read and understand, especially for those unfamiliar with this syntax.

**Other Considerations**

When writing performance-critical code, other factors beyond just the loop iteration approach can impact performance. These include:

* Array allocation and deallocation overhead
* Loop iterations that are not predictable or cache-friendly
* Cache locality and spatial memory organization

These considerations highlight the importance of understanding how loops work in JavaScript (and most programming languages) to optimize performance.

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives for iterating over an array include:

* **While loop**: Using a `while` loop with a counter variable that increments until the condition is met.
* **For...of loop**: Using the new `for...of` loop syntax, which iterates over arrays using a more straightforward and expressive syntax.

However, in this specific benchmark, only three approaches are being compared, so we'll focus on understanding those differences.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/99.0.4844.51 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 99 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
else	23.8 Ops/sec
continue	23.5 Ops/sec
short if	25.3 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

else vs continue vs short if (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: else vs continue vs short if

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

else

continue

short if

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 23 days ago):