var next = [5,6];
var list = [ [1,2], [3,4] ].push(next);
var original = [ [1,2], [3,4] ];
var list = [ original, [5,6]]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.push | |
Spread |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.push | 9952979.0 Ops/sec |
Spread | 9452252.0 Ops/sec |
I'll explain the benchmarking test you provided.
What is being tested?
The provided benchmark tests two approaches to add an element to an array in JavaScript:
...
): This syntax creates a new array by spreading the elements of an existing array.Options being compared
The benchmark compares these two approaches in terms of performance, specifically how fast they execute on different browsers and devices.
Pros and Cons of each approach
...
):Array.prototype.push()
for large arrays.Library and its purpose
In the provided benchmark, there is no specific library being used. However, the spread syntax (...
) relies on the ECMAScript standard, which defines the behavior of this operator.
Special JS feature or syntax
There are no special features or syntaxes mentioned in the benchmark definition. It's a straightforward test comparing two common array manipulation methods.
Other alternatives
If you're interested in exploring other alternatives for adding elements to arrays, consider:
unshift()
instead of push()
.concat()
instead of spread syntax.Array.prototype.splice()
instead of push/spread.Keep in mind that the performance differences between these approaches can vary depending on the specific use case, browser, and version.