Benchmark: earthJS vs jQuery2

HTML Preparation code:

<script>
  function v(type, selector, content) {
        const item = document.querySelectorAll(selector);

        if (type === "html") {
            for (let i = 0; i < item.length; i++) {
                item[i].innerHTML = content;
            }
        } else if(type === "addClass") {
            for (let i = 0; i < item.length; i++) {
                item[i].classList.add(content);
            }
        } else if (type === "removeClass") {
            for (let i = 0; i < item.length; i++) {
                item[i].classList.remove(content);
            }
        } else if (type === "toggleClass") {
            for (let i = 0; i < item.length; i++) {
                item[i].classList.toggle(content);
            }
        }
    }
</script>

<div class="new-page-container"><p>Hello<p></div>

Script Preparation code:

document.querySelector(".new-page-container p").classList.remove("test");

Tests:

Native
document.querySelector(".new-page-container p").classList.add("test");
Earth JS
v("addClass", ".new-page-container p", "test");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Native
Earth JS

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/68.0.3440.106 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 68 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Native	886304.1 Ops/sec
Earth JS	391380.0 Ops/sec

earthJS vs jQuery2 (version: 0)

comparing my new earth JS

Comparing performance of: Native vs Earth JS

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Native

Earth JS

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A