var str = "False";
JSON.parse(str.toLowerCase());
str.toLowerCase() === "true";
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Using JSON | |
Comparison |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Using JSON | 6814950.0 Ops/sec |
Comparison | 245816672.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to help explain the JavaScript benchmark.
What is being tested?
The provided benchmark tests two different approaches for comparing a string literal ("False") with a boolean value (false) in JavaScript. The test cases are:
JSON.parse()
to convert the string to a boolean value.===
) to compare the string with the boolean value.Options compared:
JSON.parse()
method, which can be slower and less efficient than other methods due to the overhead of parsing the JSON data.Pros and Cons:
Library usage:
There is no explicit library being used in this benchmark. However, JSON.parse()
is a built-in JavaScript method that relies on the ECMAScript standard.
Special JS feature or syntax:
The test case "Using JSON" uses the JSON.parse()
method, which is a standard JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 5 (ES5).
Benchmark preparation code:
The script preparation code sets up a variable str
with the string value "False"
.
Other alternatives:
In JavaScript, there are other ways to achieve the same result as the "Comparison" test case:
Boolean()
constructor: Boolean(str) === false
String()
function and the ==
operator: str == 'false'
===
operator with a string literal: str === 'false'
Note that the performance differences between these alternatives may be negligible, as they are all relatively simple operations. However, using the direct comparison syntax (===
) is generally the most efficient and recommended approach.
Overall, this benchmark helps evaluate the performance of different approaches for comparing strings with boolean values in JavaScript.