<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js"></script>
function double(n) {
return n*2;
}
var data = [Array(2000)].map((v, idx) => idx);
R.map(double, data);
data.map(double);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Ramda | |
Array (native) |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Ramda | 134180.3 Ops/sec |
Array (native) | 28233.4 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to help explain the provided benchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The MeasureThat.net website allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided benchmark compares the speed of Map
operations using three different approaches:
Array.prototype.map()
R.map()
_.map()
Options Comparison
The benchmark is testing two options for each approach:
map()
.Library Usage
The benchmark uses three libraries:
map()
for mapping over arrays.map()
function for mapping over arrays.Special JavaScript Features
The benchmark does not explicitly mention any special JavaScript features or syntax, but it's worth noting that the use of functional programming libraries like Ramda and Lodash may imply an interest in functional programming concepts.
Alternatives
Other alternatives to consider when performing similar benchmarks might include:
.map()
map()
functions in other languages or frameworksBenchmark Preparation Code
The provided script preparation code defines a simple function double(n)
that takes an input n
and returns its double value. The data
array is created using an arrow function that maps over an array of numbers from 0 to 1999 (inclusive).
Html Preparation Code
The HTML preparation code includes scripts for Ramda and Lodash, which are loaded before the benchmark script is executed.
I hope this explanation helps!