<div class="test"></div><div class="test"></div>
document.querySelector(".test")
document.getElementsByClassName(".test")[0]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
querySelector | |
getElementsByClassName |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
querySelector | 1034386.3 Ops/sec |
getElementsByClassName | 1562036.4 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark definition is a JSON object that contains information about the benchmark, including:
Name
: A unique name for the benchmark.Description
: A brief description of the benchmark. In this case, it's a slight alteration because querySelector
only returns the first element when used with a class selector.Script Preparation Code
: This field is empty in this example, which means no script is executed before running the test.Html Preparation Code
: This field contains HTML code that is used to prepare the test environment. In this case, it creates two <div>
elements with the same class name (test
) and returns an array of results.Individual Test Cases
The benchmark consists of two individual test cases:
Benchmark Definition
: The script to execute: document.querySelector(".test")
.querySelector
method to select a single element by class name.Benchmark Definition
: The script to execute: document.getElementsByClassName("test")[0]
.getElementsByClassName
method to select an array of elements and then returning only the first one.Library Usage
In both test cases, no external library is used. However, it's worth noting that if a library like jQuery were used, its methods would be tested instead.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark.
Pros and Cons of Different Approaches
The two approaches compared here are:
querySelector
: Returns the first matching element. This approach is often preferred because it's more concise and efficient.getElementsByClassName
: Returns an array of all elements that match the class name, and then returns only the first one (by indexing [0]
). This approach can be slower than querySelector
for single-element matches.Pros of querySelector
Cons of querySelector
Pros of getElementsByClassName
Cons of getElementsByClassName
querySelector
Other Alternatives
If you need to select elements based on other attributes or conditions, other approaches might be more suitable:
querySelectorAll
with a CSS selector that includes an attribute (e.g., [data-id]
) instead of just the class name..closest()
method for more complex element selection.Keep in mind that these alternatives are not directly related to the specific trade-offs between querySelector
and getElementsByClassName
.