Benchmark: obj vs array - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

var object = {}
var array = []
for (var i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
  object[i] = { id: i }
  array[i] = { id : i }
}

Tests:

for in
for (var x in object) { console.log(x, object[x]) }
forEach
array.forEach(function(x, y) { console.log(y, x) })

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
for in
forEach

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON benchmark definitions and analyze what is being tested.

**Benchmark Definitions**

The two benchmark definitions are:

1. **"for (var x in object) { console.log(x, object[x]) }"`
2. **"array.forEach(function(x, y) { console.log(y, x) })"`

These benchmarks test the performance of iterating over objects and arrays using different methods.

**Options Compared**

The two options being compared are:

* Using a `for...in` loop to iterate over an object.
* Using the `forEach` method on an array.

**Pros and Cons**

**For...in Loop:**

Pros:

* It iterates over all properties of the object, including inherited ones.
* It provides the property name (x) and its value (object[x]) in each iteration.

Cons:

* It's slower compared to `forEach` for most modern browsers.
* It can iterate over inherited properties, which might not be desirable.

**ForEach Method:**

Pros:

* Faster than `for...in` loop.
* More concise and readable code.

Cons:

* Only iterates over the array elements (x), without providing their names or values in each iteration.
* Requires a callback function to access both x and y.

**Other Considerations**

Both options have performance implications, but the `forEach` method is generally faster due to its optimized implementation. However, the choice between these two options depends on the specific requirements of your code.

In general, if you need to iterate over all properties of an object or array, including inherited ones, using a `for...in` loop might be more suitable. On the other hand, if you want a faster and more concise way to iterate over arrays, using the `forEach` method is usually a better choice.

**Library Usage**

There are no libraries explicitly mentioned in these benchmark definitions. However, it's worth noting that modern JavaScript engines (like SpiderMonkey used by Firefox) have optimized implementations of both `for...in` loops and `forEach` methods.

**Special JS Features/Syntax**

None of the provided benchmarks use any special JavaScript features or syntax, such as async/await, Promises, or Generators.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:90.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/90.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 90 on Ubuntu

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
for in	2.5 Ops/sec
forEach	2.6 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

obj vs array (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: for in vs forEach

Created: 8 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

for in

forEach

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):