var object = {}
var array = []
for (var i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
object[i] = { id: i }
array[i] = { id : i }
}
for (var x in object) { console.log(x, object[x]) }
array.forEach(function(x, y) { console.log(y, x) })
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
for in | |
forEach |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
for in | 2.5 Ops/sec |
forEach | 2.6 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON benchmark definitions and analyze what is being tested.
Benchmark Definitions
The two benchmark definitions are:
These benchmarks test the performance of iterating over objects and arrays using different methods.
Options Compared
The two options being compared are:
for...in
loop to iterate over an object.forEach
method on an array.Pros and Cons
For...in Loop:
Pros:
Cons:
forEach
for most modern browsers.ForEach Method:
Pros:
for...in
loop.Cons:
Other Considerations
Both options have performance implications, but the forEach
method is generally faster due to its optimized implementation. However, the choice between these two options depends on the specific requirements of your code.
In general, if you need to iterate over all properties of an object or array, including inherited ones, using a for...in
loop might be more suitable. On the other hand, if you want a faster and more concise way to iterate over arrays, using the forEach
method is usually a better choice.
Library Usage
There are no libraries explicitly mentioned in these benchmark definitions. However, it's worth noting that modern JavaScript engines (like SpiderMonkey used by Firefox) have optimized implementations of both for...in
loops and forEach
methods.
Special JS Features/Syntax
None of the provided benchmarks use any special JavaScript features or syntax, such as async/await, Promises, or Generators.