Benchmark: Lodash vs Ramda vs Underscore 1.9.0 - IE11 Compatible with vanilla

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.4/lodash.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
  window.lodash = _;
  _ = null;
</script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/underscore.js/1.9.0/underscore.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

  var data = _.range(10000).map(function(i) {
    return {
      counter: i
    }
  });
  
  function isOdd(num) {
    return num % 2 === 1;
  }
  
  function square(num) {
    return num * num;
  }
  
  function lessThanThreeDigits(num) {
    return num.toString().length < 3;
  }

Tests:

Lodash
var result = lodash.chain(data) .map(function(m) {return m.counter;}) .filter(isOdd) .map(square) .filter(lessThanThreeDigits) .value();
Ramda without relying on currying or composition
var result = R.filter(lessThanThreeDigits, R.map(square, R.filter(isOdd, R.pluck('counter', data))));
Ramda with currying and composition
var result = R.pipe( R.pluck('counter'), R.filter(isOdd), R.map(square), R.filter(lessThanThreeDigits) )(data);
Underscore
var result = _.chain(data) .map(function(item) {return item.counter;}) .filter(isOdd) .map(square) .filter(lessThanThreeDigits) .value();
Vanilla v1
var result = data.map(function(x) {return x.counter}) .filter(isOdd) .map(square) .filter(lessThanThreeDigits)
vanilla v2
var result = []; for (var i = 0, len = data.length; i < len; i++) { if (isOdd(data[i].counter)){ var r = square(data[i].counter); if (lessThanThreeDigits(r)) { result.push(r); } } }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash
Ramda without relying on currying or composition
Ramda with currying and composition
Underscore
Vanilla v1
vanilla v2

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 8 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:122.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/122.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 122 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Lodash	3239.8 Ops/sec
Ramda without relying on currying or composition	1640.8 Ops/sec
Ramda with currying and composition	742.0 Ops/sec
Underscore	2830.3 Ops/sec
Vanilla v1	3252.7 Ops/sec
vanilla v2	7783.3 Ops/sec

Lodash vs Ramda vs Underscore 1.9.0 - IE11 Compatible with vanilla (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Lodash vs Ramda without relying on currying or composition vs Ramda with currying and composition vs Underscore vs Vanilla v1 vs vanilla v2

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Lodash

Ramda without relying on currying or composition

Ramda with currying and composition

Underscore

Vanilla v1

vanilla v2

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A