MeasureThat.net
  • Create a benchmark
  • Online Toolsnew
  • About
  • Feedback
  • Buy me a coffeeBuy me a coffee

 Generating Complex Keys (version: 3)

This is an attempt to figure out how to generate complex keys (for use in a `Map` lookup) in the fastest way possible, that can still be parsed at a later date for use in filtering, etc. ex: `'[794456, 2016]'`

Comparing performance of: JSON.stringify (numbers) vs JSON.stringify (strings) vs Template Strings (numbers) vs Template Strings (strings) vs String Concatenation (numbers) vs String Concatenation (strings)

Created: 7 years ago by: Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

  • JSON.stringify (numbers)

  • JSON.stringify (strings)

  • Template Strings (numbers)

  • Template Strings (strings)

  • String Concatenation (numbers)

  • String Concatenation (strings)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    JSON.stringify (numbers)
    JSON.stringify (strings)
    Template Strings (numbers)
    Template Strings (strings)
    String Concatenation (numbers)
    String Concatenation (strings)

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.
Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics
Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: 4 years ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/81.0.4033.2 Safari/537.36
Chrome 81 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
Test name Executions per second
JSON.stringify (numbers) 842754.3 Ops/sec
JSON.stringify (strings) 701421.1 Ops/sec
Template Strings (numbers) 1610547.0 Ops/sec
Template Strings (strings) 1629763.0 Ops/sec
String Concatenation (numbers) 1645776.0 Ops/sec
String Concatenation (strings) 1720763.0 Ops/sec