Benchmark: np sorting test - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

function getRandomInt(max) {
  return Math.floor(Math.random() * Math.floor(max));
}

var arr = [];
for(var i = 0; i < 1000; i++){
  arr.push({value:getRandomInt(100)});
}

Tests:

_.orderBy(arr, "value", "asc")
_.orderBy(arr,"value");
_.sortBy(arr,"value");
_.sortBy(arr,"value");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
_.orderBy(arr, "value", "asc")
_.sortBy(arr,"value");

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/71.0.3578.98 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 71 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
_.orderBy(arr, "value", "asc")	529.0 Ops/sec
_.sortBy(arr,"value");	535.8 Ops/sec

np sorting test (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: _.orderBy(arr, "value", "asc") vs _.sortBy(arr,"value");

Created: 6 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

_.orderBy(arr, "value", "asc")

_.sortBy(arr,"value");

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A