var props = {a:1,b:1,c:1,d:1,e:1,f:1,g:1,h:1,i:1,j:1,k:1,l:1,m:1,n:1,o:1,p:1,q:1,r:1,s:1,t:1,u:1,v:1,w:1,x:1,y:1,z:1};
for (var i=0;i<1000;i++){
var key = i.toString();
props[i]=i;
}
for (var p in props) {
if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(props, p)) {
props[p] = 2;
}
}
for (var k=Object.keys(props), l=k.length, i=0; i<l; i++) {
props[k[i]] = 2;
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
hasOwnProperty | |
Object.keys |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
hasOwnProperty | 46482.7 Ops/sec |
Object.keys | 100873.3 Ops/sec |
The benchmark defined in the provided JSON is meant to compare two different methods of iterating over properties of an object in JavaScript. Specifically, it tests:
hasOwnProperty
for property checksObject.keys
to retrieve property keyshasOwnProperty
Benchmark Code:
for (var p in props) {
if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(props, p)) {
props[p] = 2;
}
}
Summary of Approach:
for...in
loop to iterate over all enumerable properties of an object (props
).hasOwnProperty
method is employed to check whether the property belongs to the object directly and is not inherited.Pros:
Cons:
hasOwnProperty
for each iteration.for...in
loop also iterates over inherited properties unless filtered by hasOwnProperty
, which can lead to potential bugs or performance issues if not handled.Object.keys
Benchmark Code:
for (var k = Object.keys(props), l = k.length, i = 0; i < l; i++) {
props[k[i]] = 2;
}
Summary of Approach:
Object.keys
, which returns an array of the object’s own enumerable property names.for
loop to iterate through the array of keys.Pros:
hasOwnProperty
method since it does not include the overhead of additional checks in each iteration.Cons:
In this benchmark, no specific external libraries are used—everything operates within native JavaScript functionality. The benchmark primarily relies on core language features such as objects and iteration constructs.
From the latest benchmark results, we observe that:
Object.keys
: Executed at approximately 100,873 operations per second.hasOwnProperty
: Executed at approximately 46,483 operations per second.The benchmark clearly shows that using Object.keys
is significantly faster than using hasOwnProperty
with a for...in
loop for checking object properties.
Other Alternatives:
Object.entries
: This would provide an array of key-value pairs for both own properties and could be used in a similar loop structure.
Map
Objects: If you require a more efficient way to manage key-value pairs without the concerns of inheritance, using a Map
object might be preferable.
forEach
method: If you are leveraging arrays (after getting keys using Object.keys
), you could also consider using the .forEach()
method for clearer and more expressive code.
Overall, the decision between these methods should take into account the specific requirements of your code (e.g., speed vs memory efficiency) and the context in which they are implemented.