Benchmark: JS Split VS RegExp

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

/*your preparation JavaScript code goes here
To execute async code during the script preparation, wrap it as function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction, example:*/
async function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction() {
    // This function is optional, feel free to remove it.
    // await someThing();
}

Tests:

Split
/*When writing async/deferred tests, use `deferred.resolve()` to mark test as done*/ const hasSubdomain = (hostname) => { return hostname.split('.').length > 2; }; hasSubdomain('pixel.barion.com');
RegExp
const hasSubdomain = (hostname) => { return /^[^.]+\.[^.]+\./.test(hostname); }; hasSubdomain('pixel.barion.com');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Split
RegExp

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 132 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Split	12315885.0 Ops/sec
RegExp	15790837.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated 6 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

The benchmark defined on MeasureThat.net compares two approaches to determine if a given hostname contains a subdomain: using a string `split` method versus using a regular expression (RegExp). Below is a detailed examination of each option, their pros and cons, and some other considerations relevant for software engineers.

### Test Cases Overview

1. **Split Method**
   - **Benchmark Definition**: 
     ```javascript
     const hasSubdomain = (hostname) => {
         return hostname.split('.').length > 2;
     };
     ```
   - **Test Name**: "Split"
   - **Functionality**: This approach splits the hostname by the `.` (dot) character and checks if the resultant array has more than two elements. If true, the function indicates the presence of a subdomain.

2. **Regular Expression (RegExp)**
   - **Benchmark Definition**: 
     ```javascript
     const hasSubdomain = (hostname) => {
         return /^[^.]+\\.[^.]+\\./.test(hostname);
     };
     ```
   - **Test Name**: "RegExp"
   - **Functionality**: This method uses a regular expression to check for the presence of a subdomain by ensuring that the hostname has at least one dot character preceding and following the segment that represents the subdomain.

### Pros and Cons

#### Split Method
- **Pros**:
  - **Simplicity**: The logic is straightforward and easy to understand for those familiar with arrays and string methods in JavaScript.
  - **Performance**: For shorter strings, splitting a string can often result in high performance, as shown by the benchmark results where it executed around 51,246,652 times per second.

- **Cons**:
  - **Memory Overhead**: Using `split` creates an array in memory which can be slightly more resource-intensive, especially with longer hostnames.
  - **Edge Cases**: The approach may not handle certain edge cases properly (e.g., IP addresses or non-standard TLDs).

#### Regular Expression Method
- **Pros**:
  - **Conciseness**: The RegExp method is compact and allows for matching complex patterns in one line of code.
  - **Flexibility**: Regular expressions can be extended for more complex validation scenarios beyond simply counting parts.

- **Cons**:
  - **Readability**: The syntax can be less readable for those unfamiliar with regular expressions, leading to potential misinterpretation or mistakes.
  - **Performance**: While still fast (executing around 48,998,256 times per second), the RegExp method may be slower compared to string operations for simpler tasks.

### Other Considerations

- **Performance Metrics**: Both methods demonstrated high performance, with the split method marginally outpacing the RegExp in this benchmark. Consider real-world scenarios for critical applications where performance differences might scale or vary based on usage patterns.
  
- **Alternatives**: Other ways to implement subdomain checks include:
  - **Using URL APIs**: For domains accessed as URLs, the `URL` constructor in JavaScript can be used, enabling structured parsing of URL components.
  - **String Indexing**: Manual checking through string indexing (e.g., using `indexOf` to find the position of the first `.`) could be a potential alternative, providing both flexibility and a mapped performance model.

- **Usability**: The choice between these methods often depends on the specific requirements of the project, including the anticipated size of the input data, performance needs, and code maintainability.

In conclusion, while both methods are viable for detecting subdomains, the trade-offs between performance, readability, and complexity dictate which approach may be the most appropriate for different applications or environments.

Related benchmarks:

JS Split VS RegExp (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Split vs RegExp

Created: 6 days ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Split

RegExp

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated 6 days ago):