<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->
let regex = /^abc.*$/
'abc123'.startsWith('abc')
regex.test('abc123')
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
startsWith | |
regex |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
startsWith | 865011968.0 Ops/sec |
regex | 27415198.0 Ops/sec |
The benchmark defined in the provided JSON measures the performance of two different approaches for checking whether a string starts with a specific substring: using the startsWith()
method and using a regular expression (regex
).
startsWith()
Method:
'abc123'.startsWith('abc')
true
or false
).Regular Expression:
regex.test('abc123')
let regex = /^abc.*$/
, matches any string that starts with 'abc'. The test
method of the regex returns true
or false
depending on whether there's a match.startsWith()
MethodPros:
Cons:
Pros:
Cons:
Readability vs Performance: In scenarios demanding high performance with simple checks, startsWith()
is often the preferred choice due to its clarity and speed. Conversely, when matching complex string patterns or rules, regex is indispensable despite the potential performance cost.
Library and Syntax: No external libraries are used here, and the syntax is pure JavaScript. The benchmark operates directly in the JavaScript environment, making use of standard language features.
While these two methods are commonly used for the specific task of checking string prefixes, other alternatives might include:
indexOf()
Method: abc123
.indexOf('abc') === 0could achieve a similar result by checking if the substring starts at index
0. However, it lacks the semantic clarity of
startsWith()`.
String Slicing: Another approach could involve comparing the sliced portion of the string: 'abc123'.substring(0, 3) === 'abc'
. This is less efficient and readable compared to startsWith()
.
In summary, this benchmark provides critical insights into the performance differences between two approaches, helping developers make informed choices based on the specific requirements of their applications.