Benchmark: .startsWith vs .charAt for single character v3

HTML Preparation code:

<div></div>

Script Preparation code:

var data = window.data = [];
const possible = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789";
var TOTAL_STRINGS = window.TOTAL_STRINGS = 100000;

function getRandomInt(max) {
  return Math.floor(Math.random() * max);
}

function makeRandomString(len) {
  var text = "";
  for( var i=0; i < len; i++ ) {
    text += possible.charAt(getRandomInt(possible.length));
  }
  return text;
}

while (data.length < TOTAL_STRINGS) {
  data.push(makeRandomString(getRandomInt(20)));
}

Tests:

startsWith
var x = 0; var TOTAL_STRINGS = window.TOTAL_STRINGS; var data = window.data; while (x < TOTAL_STRINGS) { data[x].startsWith("A"); x += 1; }
.charAt
var x = 0; var TOTAL_STRINGS = window.TOTAL_STRINGS; var data = window.data; while (x < TOTAL_STRINGS) { data[x].charAt(0) == 'A'; x += 1; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
startsWith
.charAt

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:61.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/61.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 61 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
startsWith	257.3 Ops/sec
.charAt	136.2 Ops/sec

.startsWith vs .charAt for single character v3 (version: 0)

Testing some things

Comparing performance of: startsWith vs .charAt

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

startsWith

.charAt

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A