Benchmark: Class versus factory

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Tests:

Class
class PositionComponent { constructor(x, y) { if(typeof x !== 'number') throw new Error('x must be a number'); if(typeof y !== 'number') throw new Error('y must be a number'); this.x = x; this.y = y; } } for(let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { const component = new PositionComponent(i, i); }
Factory
const createPositionComponent = (x, y) => { if(typeof x !== 'number') throw new Error('x must be a number'); if(typeof y !== 'number') throw new Error('y must be a number'); return { x: x, y: y, }; } for(let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { const component = createPositionComponent(i, i); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Class
Factory

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 18 hours ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/15.6.1 Safari/605.1.15

Browser/OS: Safari 15 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Class	51666.6 Ops/sec
Factory	2895782.2 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated yesterday):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

The benchmark being tested compares two different approaches to creating a data structure in JavaScript: using a class and using a factory function. Specifically, it evaluates their performance in terms of how many times each approach can run within a second on a given machine (in this case, using Chrome on macOS).

### Approaches Compared

1. **Class Approach**:
   - The code defines a class called `PositionComponent` with a constructor that takes two parameters, `x` and `y`. The constructor checks if these parameters are numbers and throws an error if not. Each instance of the class contains properties `x` and `y`.
   - This approach leverages JavaScript's `class` syntactic sugar, which is primarily used for creating objects and dealing with inheritance.

2. **Factory Function Approach**:
   - The code defines a factory function called `createPositionComponent` that performs similar checks on its parameters and returns an object with the same properties as the `PositionComponent` class.
   - This approach is known to be flexible and easier to understand for simple object creation.

### Performance Results
From the benchmark results:
- **Factory function** can create approximately **2,982,365** instances per second.
- **Class instance** creation is significantly slower at approximately **62,871** instances per second.

### Pros and Cons

#### Class Approach
**Pros**:
- **OOP Features**: Allows using JavaScript's object-oriented programming principles, like inheritance and encapsulation.
- **Structure**: May provide clearer structure and reusability when dealing with complex systems.

**Cons**:
- **Performance Overhead**: The overhead of instantiation using `new` and maintaining prototype chains can slow down performance, especially for operations involving many instances.
- **Complexity**: Additional boilerplate and code complexity for simple data structures, which may not be necessary.

#### Factory Function Approach
**Pros**:
- **Performance**: Generally faster due to less overhead in creating objects compared to classes, as it does not involve the complexity of `new` or prototype chains.
- **Simplicity**: Easier to use for simple object creation without the need for understanding classes.
  
**Cons**:
- **Less Structure**: Can become messy and complex in larger applications, particularly if you need to share methods or maintain inheritance relationships.
- **No Inheritance**: Doesn’t naturally support inheritance as classes do in OOP paradigms.

### Other Considerations
- **Memory Usage**: The factory functions may lead to increased memory usage if the same methods are defined separately for each instance, whereas using classes allows methods to be shared through prototypes.
- **Readability and Maintainability**: Classes can be more readable in large codebases, while factory functions are often easier to understand for smaller, straightforward tasks.

### Alternatives
Aside from classes and factory functions, there are other methodologies in JavaScript for creating objects:

- **Object.create()**: This method creates a new object with the specified prototype object and properties. It can be a good alternative for inheritance.
  
- **Using ES6 Modules**: For organizing code and sharing functionality.

- **Functional Programming:** Purely function-based approaches, leveraging first-class functions without creating objects.

In summary, the benchmark highlights a significant performance difference between using classes and factory functions in JavaScript. The choice between the two should consider the specific needs of the application and balance between performance, structure, and complexity.

Related benchmarks:

Class versus factory (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Class vs Factory

Created: yesterday by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Class

Factory

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated yesterday):