Benchmark: uuid things 444 - MeasureThat.net

Tests:

original
function myFunction() { return { "foo":"FOO", "bar":"BAR", "baz":"BAZ", } } console.log(myFunction()['bar']);
es6 + crypto
const myObj = { "foo":"FOO", "bar":"BAR", "baz":"BAZ", } console.log(myObj['bar']);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
original
es6 + crypto

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 29 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.

**Benchmark Definition Json**

The provided benchmark definition json represents a simple JavaScript function that returns an object with three properties: `foo`, `bar`, and `baz`. The function is defined using traditional JavaScript syntax, without any modern features like ES6 classes or async/await. The script preparation code is empty, which means the benchmark will use the default JavaScript engine.

**Script Preparation Code**

Since there is no script preparation code provided, MeasureThat.net will likely execute a minimal JavaScript function that creates an instance of the benchmarked function and returns it. This ensures consistency across different browsers and environments.

**Html Preparation Code**

There is no html preparation code provided, which means the benchmark will not include any HTML markup or external resources. This simplifies the testing process but may limit the scope of the benchmark.

**Test Cases**

MeasureThat.net provides two test cases:

1. **"original"`**: This test case uses traditional JavaScript syntax (function declaration) to create a function that returns an object with three properties.
2. **"es6 + crypto"`**: This test case uses ES6 syntax (const, template literals) and includes the `crypto` library, which is used for generating random values.

**Options Compared**

In this benchmark, two different approaches are compared:

1. Traditional JavaScript syntax (function declaration)
2. ES6 syntax with the `crypto` library

The pros and cons of these approaches are:

* **Traditional JavaScript syntax**:
	+ Pros: widely supported, easy to read and write.
	+ Cons: may not take advantage of modern optimizations or features.
* **ES6 syntax with `crypto` library**:
	+ Pros: allows for more concise code, can utilize modern optimizations and features.
	+ Cons: requires support for ES6 features, which might not be available in older browsers.

**Library Usage**

The `crypto` library is used in the "es6 + crypto" test case to generate random values. This library provides a set of cryptographic functions that can be used to create secure pseudorandom numbers, hashes, and more. In this benchmark, it's used to populate the object returned by the function.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark, except for ES6 syntax, which is a modern feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015.

**Alternatives**

If you were to create a new benchmark on MeasureThat.net, you could consider using different approaches, such as:

* Using Node.js instead of the browser engine.
* Incorporating external libraries or frameworks (e.g., React, Angular).
* Utilizing modern JavaScript features like async/await, promises, or web workers.
* Creating a benchmark that tests performance under specific conditions (e.g., network latency, device orientation).

These alternatives would require modifications to the benchmark definition json and potentially new test cases.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 6 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.79 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 67 on Windows 7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
original	36894.5 Ops/sec
es6 + crypto	36483.9 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

uuid things 444 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: original vs es6 + crypto

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

original

es6 + crypto

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 29 days ago):