Benchmark: eSetting Canvas Pixel2

HTML Preparation code:

<canvas id="c" width="800" height="300"></canvas>

Script Preparation code:

$c = document.getElementById('c');
$ctx = $c.getContext('2d', { alpha: false });
$ctx.clearRect(0, 0, 800, 300);
$px = $ctx.createImageData(2, 2);
$pxls = [];
for (var i=0; i<10000; ++i) $pxls.push({
   x: (Math.random() * 400 << 0) * 2,
   y: (Math.random() * 150 << 0) * 2,
   r: Math.random() * 255 << 0,
   g: Math.random() * 255 << 0,
   b: Math.random() * 255 << 0,
   a: 255
});
$i = 0;

Tests:

fillRect/concat
for (var i=200;i--;){ var px = $pxls[$i++ % 10000]; $ctx.fillStyle = 'rgba(' + px.r + ',' + px.g + ',' + px.b + ',' + (px.a / 255) + ')'; $ctx.fillRect(px.x*2, px.y*2, 2, 2); }
1×1 Image Data
for (var i=200;i--;){ var px=$pxls[$i++ % 10000], d=$px.data; d[0] = px.r; d[1] = px.g; d[2] = px.b; d[3] = px.a; $ctx.putImageData($px, px.x, px.y); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
fillRect/concat
1×1 Image Data

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 6 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/66.0.3359.139 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 66 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
fillRect/concat	1019.7 Ops/sec
1×1 Image Data	121.5 Ops/sec

eSetting Canvas Pixel2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: fillRect/concat vs 1×1 Image Data

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

fillRect/concat

1×1 Image Data

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A