<div id="container"></div>
const container = document.getElementById("container");
const contents = [
document.createElement("div"),
document.createElement("div"),
document.createElement("div"),
];
const fragment = document.createDocumentFragment();
for (const child of contents) {
fragment.appendChild(child);
}
container.appendChild(fragment);
const container = document.getElementById("container");
const contents = [
document.createElement("div"),
document.createElement("div"),
document.createElement("div"),
];
container.replaceChildren(contents);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
fragment | |
replaceChildren |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
fragment | 195094.3 Ops/sec |
replaceChildren | 131416.9 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks.
Benchmark Overview
The provided JSON represents a benchmark that compares the performance of two approaches: replacing children using document.replaceChildren()
and using a DocumentFragment
to append elements to the container.
Options Compared
Two options are being compared:
replaceChildren()
: This method replaces the child nodes of an element with a new set of nodes, without creating a new DOM tree.DocumentFragment
: A fragment is a lightweight object that can hold a collection of nodes, which can be appended to another element.Pros and Cons
replaceChildren()
Pros:
Cons:
replaceChildren()
, you have less control over the order and timing of element updates.DocumentFragment
Pros:
Cons:
Other Considerations
When deciding between these approaches, consider the specific requirements of your use case. If you need more control over element updates and event listeners, DocumentFragment
might be a better choice. However, if you prioritize performance and don't mind sacrificing some control, replaceChildren()
could be the way to go.
Library Usage
The benchmark uses the document
object, which is part of the DOM (Document Object Model) API in JavaScript. The document
object provides various methods for interacting with the DOM, including creating elements, fragments, and updating the document tree.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes used in this benchmark that require explanation.
Alternative Approaches
Other alternatives to these approaches include:
In summary, the benchmark compares two approaches for updating the DOM: using replaceChildren()
versus using a DocumentFragment
. Each approach has its pros and cons, and the choice ultimately depends on the specific requirements of your use case.