<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.20/lodash.min.js'></script>
var arr = new Array(10000).fill(0);
var myCopy = arr.slice()
var myCopy = [arr]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.slice() | |
Spread operator |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.slice() | 582598.9 Ops/sec |
Spread operator | 135642.3 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two methods for creating a shallow copy of an array: Array.slice()
and the spread operator (...
).
Options Compared
Two options are compared:
Array.slice()
: This method creates a new array that includes only the elements from the original array, starting from the specified index (or the beginning of the array if no index is provided)....
): This operator creates a new array by spreading the elements of the original array.Pros and Cons
Array.slice()
:...
):Library Used
The benchmark uses the lodash
library, which provides a utility function called cloneDeep()
that creates a deep copy of an object. However, in this specific benchmark, only shallow copies are being compared using either Array.slice()
or the spread operator.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
No special JavaScript features or syntax are being used in this benchmark. Both options are built-in methods and operators in JavaScript.
Other Considerations
Array.slice()
might be a better option.Other Alternatives
If you need to create deep copies of objects or arrays, other methods like JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj))
or using libraries like Lodash's cloneDeep()
can be used. Additionally, if you're working with large datasets and performance is critical, consider using specialized data structures or algorithms optimized for your use case.
In summary, this benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two simple yet effective methods for creating shallow copies of arrays in JavaScript: Array.slice()
and the spread operator (...
).