Benchmark: find vs some test123

Tests:

find
var a = ['1', '2', '3']; var b = !!a.find(item => item === '2');
some
var a = ['1', '2', '3']; var b = !!a.some(item => item === 'bc');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
find
some

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'd be happy to explain what's tested in the provided benchmark.

The test cases are comparing two different approaches for checking if an element exists in an array: `Array.prototype.find()` and `Array.prototype.some()`. Here's a breakdown of each:

**Test Case 1: find**

* The benchmark definition is a simple JavaScript code that creates an array `a` with three elements: `'1'`, `'2'`, and `'3'`. Then, it uses the `find()` method to check if there exists an element in the array that is equal to `'2'`.
* The purpose of this test case is to measure the performance of the `find()` method when used with a callback function.

**Test Case 2: some**

* The benchmark definition is similar to the previous one, but instead of using `find()`, it uses the `some()` method. However, the condition in the callback function is incorrect: it checks if an element is equal to `'bc'` (note the typo), which will always return false.
* The purpose of this test case is to measure the performance of the `some()` method when used with a callback function.

Now, let's discuss the pros and cons of these approaches:

**Find()**

Pros:

* More expressive and readable code, as it explicitly returns the first matching element or null if no match.
* Can be more efficient than some(), as it only iterates over the array once.

Cons:

* May return null if no element matches, which can lead to errors in downstream code.

**Some()**

Pros:

* Returns true as soon as an element matches, making it faster than find() when used with a condition that will always be false.
* Can be useful when you need to check if at least one element matches a certain condition.

Cons:

* Less expressive and less readable code, as it returns true without explicitly returning the matched element.
* May not be as efficient as find() when used with a correct callback function.

Other considerations:

* The benchmark results show that Chrome 129 on Mac OS X 10.15.7 is executing the `some()` test case faster than the `find()` test case, despite the incorrect condition in the latter.
* This highlights the importance of testing with accurate conditions and ensuring that downstream code can handle the returned values.

The provided benchmark script doesn't use any libraries or special JS features (other than the ones mentioned above). However, it's worth noting that both `Array.prototype.find()` and `Array.prototype.some()` are part of the ECMAScript standard, so they are widely supported across most browsers and environments.

As for alternatives, you could consider using other methods to check if an element exists in an array, such as:

* Using `indexOf()`: this method returns the index of the first matching element or -1 if no match is found.
* Using `includes()`: this method returns true if the array contains the specified value and false otherwise.
* Using a manual loop: you could use a for...of loop or a traditional for loop to iterate over the array and check each element.

However, these alternatives may not be as efficient or readable as using `find()` or `some()`, especially for large arrays.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one month ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/129.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 129 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
find	107582776.0 Ops/sec
some	109037344.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

find vs some test123 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: find vs some

Created: one month ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

find

some

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):