origDate = new Date();
new Date(origDate)
new Date(origDate.getTime())
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Clone Date object | |
Clone via Timestamp |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Clone Date object | 34523104.0 Ops/sec |
Clone via Timestamp | 33491768.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested.
Benchmark Definition:
The benchmark definition is a JSON object that describes the experiment. In this case, it's testing two approaches for cloning dates:
new Date(origDate)
( Clone Date object )new Date(origDate.getTime())
( Clone via Timestamp )The script preparation code initializes an original date variable origDate
using the new Date()
constructor.
Options Compared:
Two options are being compared:
new Date()
constructor.getTime()
) as an argument to the new Date()
constructor.Pros and Cons:
Library Used:
None is explicitly mentioned in this benchmark definition.
Special JS Feature/Syntax:
The getTime()
method is used to obtain the timestamp of a Date object. This method returns the number of milliseconds since January 1, 1970, 00:00:00 UTC.
Other Considerations:
When comparing these two approaches, it's essential to consider factors like:
Alternatives:
If you wanted to explore alternative approaches for cloning dates, you could try:
lodash.cloneDate
) or Moment.js (moment.clone())Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on your specific use case, requirements, and performance constraints.