var foo = null;
foo = "FOO";
var foo = "";
foo = "FOO";
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
overwrite null | |
overwrite Str |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
overwrite null | 1085840768.0 Ops/sec |
overwrite Str | 1071147200.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the benchmark results.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark tests two different approaches to overwriting a string variable in JavaScript:
null
.""
).Test Case Descriptions
The benchmark consists of two individual test cases, each representing one of the above approaches:
foo
with null
, and then assigns a new value "FOO"
to it.foo
with an empty string (""
), and then assigns a new value "FOO"
to it.Library Used
No external libraries are used in this benchmark.
JavaScript Features or Syntax Used
None specific JavaScript features or syntax are used beyond the standard JavaScript assignment operator (=
) and string concatenation.
Pros/Cons of Different Approaches
The main difference between these two approaches lies in how the variable is initialized:
null
, which can be faster since it doesn't require creating an empty string. However, when assigning a new value, JavaScript needs to allocate memory for the string and create a new reference.""
), which requires allocating memory for the string. When assigning a new value, only the contents of the string need to be updated.Other Alternatives
While not directly related to this specific benchmark, other approaches to initializing and updating strings in JavaScript include:
foo = ''; foo = 'FOO';
foo = '' + 'FOO';
However, these alternatives are not being tested in this specific benchmark.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the benchmark compares two approaches to overwriting a string variable:
null
and assign a new value.""
) and assign a new value.The results show that overwrite null is slightly faster than overwrite Str, indicating that initializing with null
might be a better approach in scenarios where performance is critical. However, this difference may not be significant enough to warrant changing established coding practices unless otherwise justified by profiling or other performance-critical requirements.