Benchmark: lodash assign vs object.assign vs spread

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Tests:

lodash assign
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my' }; var b = { c: 'goddess' }; var c = _.assign(a, b);
object.assign
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my' }; var b = { c: 'goddess' }; var c = Object.assign(a, b);
spread
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my' }; var b = { c: 'goddess' }; var c = { ...a, ...b };

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
lodash assign
object.assign
spread

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.1:latest, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript benchmarking.

**What is being tested?**

The provided JSON represents a benchmark test that compares three different approaches to assigning properties from one object to another:

1. **Lodash assign**: Using the `_assign` function from the Lodash library (a popular utility library for functional programming in JavaScript).
2. **Object.assign**: The built-in `Object.assign` method, which is a part of the ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) standard.
3. **Spread operator**: Using the spread syntax (`{ ...object1, ...object2 }`) to create a new object with properties from both objects.

**What options are compared?**

The three test cases compare different ways to assign properties from one object (`b`) to another (`a`):

* In each case, `a` and `b` are initialized as objects: `var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my' };\n var b = { c: 'goddess' };`.
* The test cases then assign properties from `b` to `a`, using:
	+ Lodash's `_assign` function (`var c = _.assign(a, b);`)
	+ The built-in `Object.assign` method (`var c = Object.assign(a, b);`)
	+ The spread operator syntax (`var c = { ...a, ...b };`)

**Pros and Cons of each approach:**

1. **Lodash assign**: Pros:
	* Easy to use and understand.
	* Works across different browsers and versions (including older ones).
	* Well-documented in the Lodash library.
	Cons:
		- Requires including an additional library (Lodash) in your project.
2. **Object.assign**: Pros:
	* A built-in method, so no extra library is needed.
	* Part of the ES6 standard, so widely supported.
	* Performs well for most use cases.
	Cons:
		- May have performance issues with very large objects or complex nesting (as seen in this benchmark).
3. **Spread operator**: Pros:
	+ A concise and expressive syntax.
	+ Works well with modern JavaScript environments.
	+ No additional library needed.
	Cons:
		- May not be as performant as `Object.assign` for large datasets.

**Other considerations:**

* The spread operator (`{ ...a, ...b }`) is a newer feature in JavaScript (introduced in ES6) and may not work correctly in older browsers or environments.
* Lodash's `_assign` function provides more advanced features (like merging objects with arrays), which might be useful depending on your use case.

**What library is used?**

The `lodash` library is a popular utility library for functional programming in JavaScript. It provides various functions, including the `_assign` method, to make working with data structures easier and more efficient.

That's it!

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 8 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/122.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 122 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
lodash assign	4462793.0 Ops/sec
object.assign	6402160.5 Ops/sec
spread	18746944.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

lodash assign vs object.assign vs spread (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: lodash assign vs object.assign vs spread

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

lodash assign

object.assign

spread

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.1:latest, generated one month ago):