const a = [ "Hello", true, 10 ],
b = [ "World", false, 4 ];
let c = [ a, b ];
const a = [ "Hello", true, 10 ],
b = [ "World", false, 4 ];
let c = a.concat(b);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Spread operator | |
Concat |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Spread operator | 24733118.0 Ops/sec |
Concat | 8556215.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested.
What is being tested?
The benchmark compares two approaches to concatenate arrays in JavaScript:
...
)concat()
methodThe test case provides a simple example where two arrays, a
and b
, are created with some initial values. Then, either the spread operator or the concat()
method is used to create a new array c
that includes all elements from both a
and b
.
Options being compared:
...
)Pros and Cons of each approach:
...
)Library/Functionality:
There is no library or functionality being tested in this benchmark. The focus is solely on comparing two built-in JavaScript features.
Special JS feature/Syntax:
The benchmark utilizes the new ES6 spread operator (...
), which is a syntax feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It allows for more concise and expressive way of creating arrays by "spreading" elements from one array to another.
Other alternatives:
If you want to concatenate arrays using other methods, some alternatives include:
Array.prototype.push()
method to add elements to an existing arrayArray
constructor and then pushing individual elements onto itHowever, these approaches are generally less concise and expressive than using the spread operator or the concat()
method.
I hope this explanation helps you understand the benchmark!