Benchmark: chain replace - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

var example = "\n③：反应⑤的化学方程式是：\n$$ \\text{C}_6\\text{H}_4(\\text{NO}_2)\\text{O}\\text{C}_2\\text{H}_5 + 3\\text{Fe} + 4\\text{H}_2\\text{O} + \\text{HCl} \\rightarrow \\text{C}_6\\text{H}_4(\\text{NH}_2)\\text{O}\\text{C}_2\\text{H}_5 + 3\\text{FeCl}_2}$$\n④：菲那西汀水解的化学方程式是：\n$$ \\text{C}_6\\text{H}_4(\\text{NHCOCH}_3)\\text{O}\\text{C}_2\\text{H}_5 + \\text{H}_2\\text{O} \\rightarrow \\text{C}_6\\text{H}_4(\\text{NH}_2)\\text{O}\\text{C}_2\\text{H}_5 + \\text{CH}_3\\text{COOH}$$";

Tests:

chain replace
example .replace(/\\([[(])\n?/g, "$$$1") .replace(/\n?\\([)\]])/g, "$1$$") .replace(/log\s([\S]+)/g, "log_$1") .replace(/\n/g, "<br/>") .replace(/((\${1,2})[^$]+(\2))/g, (...args) => { return ( "$" + args[1] .replace(/\${1,2}([^$]+)\${1,2}/g, "$1") .trim() .replace("<br/>", "") + "$" ); });
chain replace&split
var res = []; example .replace(/\\([[(])\n?/g, "$$$1") .replace(/\n?\\([)\]])/g, "$1$$") .replace(/log\s([\S]+)/g, "log_$1") .replace(/\n/g, "<br/>") .split(/((\${1,2})[^$]+(\2))/g); res.map((item) => { return ( "$" + item .replace(/\${1,2}([^$]+)\${1,2}/g, "$1") .trim() .replace("<br/>", "") + "$" ); }).join('');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
chain replace
chain replace&split

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Measuring JavaScript performance is crucial for understanding how well your application will perform in real-world scenarios. MeasurThat.net provides a great platform for this purpose.

Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested, compared options, pros and cons, library usage, special JS features or syntax, and other considerations.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition represents the script that will be executed on multiple browsers to measure its performance. In this case, we have two test cases:

1. `chain replace`: This test case measures the performance of a chain of regular expression replacements.
2. `chain replace&split`: This test case is similar to the previous one but also includes a call to the `split()` method.

**Options Compared**

In the benchmark definition, we can see two main options being compared:

* `replace(/.../g, ...)`: This option uses the `replace()` method with a global flag (`g`) to replace all occurrences of a pattern in the string. The replacement function takes a match object as an argument and returns the modified string.
* `split(/.../g)`: This option uses the `split()` method with a global flag (`g`) to split the string into an array of substrings based on a separator.

**Pros and Cons**

The two options have different performance characteristics:

* `replace()`:
	+ Pros: More flexible replacement syntax, can handle multiple substitutions in a single call.
	+ Cons: Slower than `split()` for large strings due to the overhead of regular expression matching and substitution.
* `split()`: 
	+ Pros: Faster than `replace()` for large strings since it only needs to iterate over the string once to find all occurrences of the separator.
	+ Cons: Less flexible replacement syntax, requires iterating over individual matches.

**Library Usage**

There is no explicit library usage in the benchmark definition. However, the regular expression syntax used in both options assumes that the browser supports modern JavaScript and ECMAScript standardization (e.g., `global` flag).

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

No special JavaScript features or syntax are being tested in this benchmark.

**Other Considerations**

* The benchmark definition uses a custom script to prepare the test string, which might affect the results. It's essential to ensure that the preparation code is executed efficiently and accurately.
* The `chain replace&split` test case includes a call to the `map()` method, which can add additional overhead due to array iteration.

**Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternative approaches to measure JavaScript performance, consider:

1. V8 Profiler: A Chrome DevTools extension that provides detailed profiling information for JavaScript execution.
2. Node.js Benchmarking Library: A library that allows you to write benchmarking tests specifically designed for Node.js environments.
3. JSHunter: A tool that measures the performance of JavaScript code by executing it in a sandboxed environment.

In conclusion, understanding the options being compared and their performance characteristics is crucial for optimizing your JavaScript code for real-world scenarios. By analyzing the provided benchmark definition, you can gain insights into the trade-offs between different approaches and choose the best option for your use case.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 127 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
chain replace	113473.4 Ops/sec
chain replace&split	79126.8 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

chain replace (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: chain replace vs chain replace&split

Created: 2 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

chain replace

chain replace&split

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):