var data = { Array.from(Array(20).keys()) };
Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(data).map((key, value) => [key, value]));
Object.entries(data).reduce((acc, [k, v]) => {
acc[k] = v.toString();
return acc;
}, {});
Object.entries(data).reduce((acc, [k, v]) => ({
acc,
[k]: v.toString()
}), {});
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Object.fromEntries | |
Reduce (reuse object) | |
Reduce (creating temporary objects) |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Object.fromEntries | 203014.4 Ops/sec |
Reduce (reuse object) | 1137233.9 Ops/sec |
Reduce (creating temporary objects) | 537297.9 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what is tested in this benchmark.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark tests two approaches to create an object from an array of key-value pairs: Object.fromEntries
and the reduce()
method with two variations:
Options Compared
The benchmark compares the performance of these three approaches:
Object.fromEntries
: creates an object from an array of key-value pairs by iterating over the array and adding properties to the resulting object.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Object.fromEntries
:Library/Function Usage
The benchmark uses the reduce()
method, which is a built-in JavaScript function. The Object.fromEntries()
function was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and provides a more concise way of creating an object from an array of key-value pairs.
Special JS Features/Syntax
There are no specific JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark that require special explanation.
Other Considerations
When choosing between these approaches, consider the following:
Object.fromEntries
might be a better choice.Alternative Approaches
Other approaches to create an object from an array of key-value pairs could include:
Array.prototype.reduce()
with a custom accumulator object.These alternative approaches might offer different trade-offs in terms of performance, readability, and maintainability.