var x = Math.pow(54,3);
var y = 54*54*54
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
pow | |
mult |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
pow | 19792870.0 Ops/sec |
mult | 234830352.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested.
What is tested?
The benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches: using Math.pow()
(also known as exponentiation) and manual multiplication (*
) for calculating the cube of a number (3^x
).
Options compared:
Two options are being compared:
Math.pow(54, 3)
: This is the first option, which uses the built-in Math.pow()
function to calculate the cube of 54.54 * 54 * 54
: The second option is a manual multiplication of three numbers to achieve the same result.Pros and Cons:
Math.pow()
:54 * 54 * 54
):Math.pow()
1 << 18
)Other considerations:
Math.pow()
might result in slightly different results due to rounding errors.Math.pow()
function differently, affecting its performance.Library usage:
The benchmark doesn't explicitly mention any libraries being used. However, it's possible that the test code uses the built-in Math
library for the exponentiation operations.
Special JS features or syntax:
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the provided code snippets.
Now, let's consider other alternatives:
1 << x
) for integer exponentsx
times and multiply by 54
mathjs
or exponent.js
specifically designed for mathematical operationsThese alternatives would require additional setup and modifications to the test code to cover their performance characteristics and potential variations across different browsers and devices.