Benchmark: benchmarkname-1123123 123 ds1s

Script Preparation code:

var c1 = 0x1453dc;
var c2 = 0x228004;

Tests:

1
const result = ((c1 & 0xFF) - (c2 & 0xFF)) ** 2 + ((c1 >> 0x08 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 0x08 & 0xFF)) ** 2 + ((c1 >> 0x10 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 0x10 & 0xFF)) ** 2;
2
const result = ((c1 & 0xFF) - (c2 & 0xFF)) * ((c1 & 0xFF) - (c2 & 0xFF)) + ((c1 >> 0x08 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 0x08 & 0xFF)) * ((c1 >> 0x08 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 0x08 & 0xFF)) + ((c1 >> 0x10 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 0x10 & 0xFF)) * ((c1 >> 0x10 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 0x10 & 0xFF));
3
const r = (c1 >> 0x10 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 0x10 & 0xFF); const g = (c1 >> 0x08 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 0x08 & 0xFF); const b = (c1 & 0xFF) - (c2 & 0xFF); const result = r * r + g * g + b * b;
4
const r = (c1 >> 0x10 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 0x10 & 0xFF); const g = (c1 >> 0x08 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 0x08 & 0xFF); const b = (c1 & 0xFF) - (c2 & 0xFF); const result = r ** 2 + g ** 2 + b ** 2;
5
const r1 = c1 & 0xFF; const g1 = c1 >> 8 & 0xFF; const b1 = c1 >> 16 & 0xFF; const r2 = c2 & 0xFF; const g2 = c2 >> 8 & 0xFF; const b2 = c2 >> 16 & 0xFF; const r = r1 - r2; const g = g1 - g2; const b = b1 - b2; const result = r * r + g * g + b * b;
6
const r1 = c1 & 0xFF; const g1 = c1 >> 8 & 0xFF; const b1 = c1 >> 16 & 0xFF; const r2 = c2 & 0xFF; const g2 = c2 >> 8 & 0xFF; const b2 = c2 >> 16 & 0xFF; const r = r1 - r2; const g = g1 - g2; const b = b1 - b2; const result = r ** 2 + g ** 2 + b ** 2;
7
const r = (c1 & 0xFF) - (c2 & 0xFF); const g = (c1 >> 8 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 8 & 0xFF); const b = (c1 >> 16 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 16 & 0xFF); const result = r * r + g * g + b * b;
8
const r = (c1 & 0xFF) - (c2 & 0xFF); const g = (c1 >> 8 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 8 & 0xFF); const b = (c1 >> 16 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 16 & 0xFF); const result = r ** 2 + g ** 2 + b ** 2;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

It looks like we have some benchmarking results from Chrome 127 running on Windows.

Let's analyze the results:

* The top 4 results are for Test Name "4" with high ExecutionPerSecond values (2246592.5, 2244096.25, 2241894.0, and 2235877.25). This suggests that this test is relatively fast on Chrome 127.
* The next 3 results are for Test Name "1" with lower ExecutionPerSecond values (2223245.75, 2222390.5, and 2167420.0). This test seems to be slower than the top 4 results but still relatively quick.
* Test Names "2", "3", and "6" have low ExecutionPerSecond values (1134217.375, 2241894.0, and 2223245.75 respectively), indicating they are slower than the top 4 results. However, we can't directly compare these tests to each other without more context.
* Test Name "5" has an ExecutionPerSecond value (2223245.75) that's relatively close to Test Names "1", "3", and "6".
* The lowest result is for Test Name "8" with a very low ExecutionPerSecond value (2167420.0).

Unfortunately, without the specific benchmark code or more context about what each test is measuring, we can't provide a definitive answer on which test is faster or why.

However, based on the results alone, it seems that:

* Test Name "4" is relatively fast.
* Tests Names "1", "3", and "6" are slower than Test Name "4".
* Test Names "2" and "5" have ExecutionPerSecond values in between the top and bottom results.
* Test Name "8" has a very low value, indicating it might be one of the slowest tests.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 127 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
1	2235877.2 Ops/sec
2	1134217.4 Ops/sec
3	2244096.2 Ops/sec
4	2246592.5 Ops/sec
5	2223245.8 Ops/sec
6	2222390.5 Ops/sec
7	2241894.0 Ops/sec
8	2167420.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

benchmarkname-1123123 123 ds1s (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: 1 vs 2 vs 3 vs 4 vs 5 vs 6 vs 7 vs 8

Created: 2 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):