const targetElem = document.createElement( 'DIV' );
targetElem.id = 'target';
document.body.appendChild( targetElem );
document.getElementById( 'target' ).innerHTML = `
<div>
<span>Child 4</span>
</div>
`;
document.getElementById( 'target' ).insertAdjacentHTML( 'beforeend', `
<div>
<span>Child 4</span>
</div>
` );
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
innerHTML | |
insertAdjacentHTML |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
innerHTML | 220833.5 Ops/sec |
insertAdjacentHTML | 278060.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the benchmark definition and explain what is being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test that compares two JavaScript methods for inserting HTML content into an element: insertAdjacentHTML
and innerHTML
. The benchmark defines two test cases:
Options Compared
The benchmark compares these two options because they serve different purposes and have different performance characteristics:
insertAdjacentHTML
is a more modern and efficient way to insert HTML content, as it avoids the need to parse the existing HTML contents of the element.innerHTML
, on the other hand, parses the entire HTML content of the element and sets it as the inner HTML, which can be slower and less memory-efficient.Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
insertAdjacentHTML
Pros:
innerHTML
since it avoids parsing the existing HTML contents.Cons:
innerHTML
Pros:
Cons:
Library Usage
There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that insertAdjacentHTML
was introduced as a part of the Web API in modern browsers, while innerHTML
has been around since the early days of HTML.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes used in this benchmark.
Other Alternatives
If you're looking for alternative methods to insert HTML content, here are a few options:
createTextNode()
method and appending it to the element's child list.Keep in mind that each of these alternatives has its own trade-offs in terms of performance, memory usage, and browser support.