const length = 1000;
const arrayBuffer = new ArrayBuffer(length);
const array = new Uint8Array(arrayBuffer);
for (let i = 0; i < length; i++) {
array[i] = 22;
}
const dataView = new DataView(arrayBuffer);
const transferArray = new Uint8Array(dataView);
const resultArray = [transferArray].map(Boolean);
const length = 1000;
const arrayBuffer = new ArrayBuffer(length);
const array = new Uint8Array(arrayBuffer);
for (let i = 0; i < length; i++) {
array[i] = 22;
}
const dataView = new DataView(arrayBuffer);
const transferArray = new Uint8Array(dataView);
const resultArray = [transferArray];
for (let i = 0; i < length; i++) {
resultArray[i] = Boolean(resultArray[i]);
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
slice() with map() | |
slice() with for loop |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
slice() with map() | 422438.9 Ops/sec |
slice() with for loop | 8035.1 Ops/sec |
Benchmark Overview
MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks, comparing different approaches to a specific task.
The provided benchmark definition is testing two approaches to convert binary data from a DataView to a boolean array:
Array.prototype.slice()
method to extract a subset of elements from the DataView's Uint8Array and then applies the Boolean()
function to each element using Array.prototype.map()
.Array.prototype.slice()
, and then iterates over the resulting array using a traditional for
loop, applying the Boolean()
function to each element.Options Comparison
The two approaches have different pros and cons:
map()
function to apply the conversion to all elements in parallel. However, this might come at the cost of more memory usage due to the creation of a new array.for
loop to iterate over each element individually. However, this might be more memory-efficient since it doesn't create a new array.Library and Special JS Features
In the benchmark definition, the library used is not explicitly mentioned. However, the use of DataView
and ArrayBuffer
suggests that the test relies on Web Workers or worker threads to execute the code.
There are no special JavaScript features (e.g., async/await, generators) used in this benchmark.
Other Alternatives
If you were to write a similar benchmark, you could also consider the following alternatives:
Array.from()
instead of slice()
: This would eliminate the need for the for
loop and potentially make the code more concise.Keep in mind that these alternatives would likely change the execution time and memory usage characteristics of the benchmark.