this.number = Math.random() * 1000;
return Math.max(250, Math.min(750, this.number));
var number = this.number;
if(number < 250) return 250;
if(number > 750) return 750;
return number;
var number = this.number;
return number < 250 ? 250 : (number > 750 ? 750 : number);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Math.max/min | |
if | |
ternary |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Math.max/min | 43270860.0 Ops/sec |
if | 425364032.0 Ops/sec |
ternary | 408716128.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
The provided JSON represents a benchmark that compares three different approaches to find the maximum or minimum value between two numbers: Math.max
, if
statement, and ternary operator (?:
). We'll break down each option, its pros and cons, and any relevant considerations.
1. Math.max/min
This approach uses the built-in Math.max
or Math.min
functions to find the maximum or minimum value between two numbers. The JavaScript engine can optimize these functions internally, making them a good choice for benchmarks that involve mathematical operations.
Pros:
Cons:
2. if statement
This approach uses an if
statement to check the conditions and return the corresponding value. This method allows for more control over the calculation process but can be slower than the Math.max/min
approach due to the overhead of the conditional checks.
Pros:
Cons:
Math.max/min
3. ternary operator (?:)
The ternary operator is a shorthand way to write an if
statement in a single expression. This approach combines the benefits of both the if
statement and Math.max/min
.
Pros:
Cons:
Math.max/min
if
statementsLibrary usage:
In this benchmark, there is no explicit library usage. However, it's worth noting that some libraries like lodash
or ramda
can provide optimized functions for mathematical operations, which might affect the benchmark results.
Special JS features or syntax:
None of the provided benchmark definitions use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what is standard in modern JavaScript implementations (ECMAScript 2015+).
Other alternatives:
If you wanted to test alternative approaches, some possible options could be:
Math.max
with bitwise shift or comparison)max
/min
function using loopsKeep in mind that these alternatives would likely have varying levels of performance and readability compared to the original benchmark.
In summary, the Math.max/min
approach is generally the fastest due to its native implementation, while the if
statement provides more control but at the cost of slightly slower execution speed. The ternary operator offers a balanced solution with compact code.