const array = Array.from({ length: 1000 }, (_, i) => ({ key: `key${i}`, value: i }));
function reduce() {
return array.reduce((acc, { key, value }) => {
acc[key] = value;
return acc;
}, {});
}
function objectFromEntries() {
return Object.fromEntries(array.map(({ key, value }) => [key, value]));
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
reduce | |
Object.fromEntries |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
reduce | 171484560.0 Ops/sec |
Object.fromEntries | 194263264.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is defined by two JavaScript functions: reduce
and objectFromEntries
. Both functions are designed to process an array of objects with key-value pairs. The main difference between them lies in how they create and manipulate the resulting object.
Reduce Function
The reduce
function takes an initial value ({}
) and iterates through the array, accumulating values into the accumulator (acc
). In this implementation, each object in the array is assigned to a property of the accumulator, effectively creating a new object with the key-value pairs. The resulting object is then returned.
Object.fromEntries Function
The objectFromEntries
function uses the Object.fromEntries()
method, which creates a new object from an iterable (in this case, an array of key-value pairs). This approach is more concise and modern than the reduce
function.
Comparison
The benchmark compares the performance of these two approaches:
Object.fromEntries()
method.Pros and Cons
Reduce Function:
Pros:
Cons:
objectFromEntries
functionObject.fromEntries Function:
Pros:
Cons:
Object.fromEntries()
(though it's widely supported)Library Usage
In this benchmark, there is no explicit library usage. However, the Array.from()
method used in both implementations relies on the built-in Array.prototype.from()
method, which is part of the JavaScript standard library.
Special JS Features/Syntax
There are no specific JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark that would require a deeper understanding of advanced topics like closures, async/await, or modern JavaScript paradigms. The code focuses on basic array manipulation and object creation using modern methods.
Alternatives
If you're looking for alternatives to these two approaches, consider the following:
for
loops with index iteration to create an object from an array of key-value pairs.{...}
) to create a new object and then iterate through the array, assigning values to properties.array.map()
to transform an array into an array of key-value pairs and then pass it to Object.assign()
to create a new object.Keep in mind that each approach has its trade-offs in terms of performance, readability, and maintainability.