string = "This is a benchmark to test if matching a regex is faster that splitting a string";
regex = /\S+/gi;
string.split(/|s/)
string.match(regex)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
String.split | |
Regex.match |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
String.split | 140448.9 Ops/sec |
Regex.match | 639814.1 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark measures the performance difference between two string manipulation operations: string.match()
with regular expressions (regex) against string.split()
. The goal is to compare how fast each operation is for splitting a string at spaces.
Script Preparation Code
The script preparation code sets up the initial variables:
string
: a test string containing multiple words separated by spaces.regex
: a regex pattern used in the string.match()
method, which matches one or more non-space characters (\\S+
) with the i
flag for case-insensitive matching.Html Preparation Code
There is no HTML preparation code provided, indicating that this benchmark focuses on JavaScript performance without considering other factors like DOM manipulation or UI rendering.
Individual Test Cases
The two test cases compare the performance of:
split()
method with a regex pattern (/|\s/
).match()
method with the predefined regex pattern (regex
).Comparison of Options
Here's a brief overview of each approach, their pros and cons:
match()
does.Library Usage
The benchmark uses the built-in String.prototype.match()
method, which is a JavaScript standard library function. This method returns an array containing any matches or null if no match is found.
Special JS Features/Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark.
Other Considerations
When choosing between these two approaches, consider the following:
String.split()
might be a better choice.Regex.match()
is likely a better option.Alternatives
Other alternatives for string splitting or pattern matching include:
String.prototype.replace()
with a callback function$.trim()
or other regex-heavy toolsKeep in mind that the choice of method depends on your specific requirements, performance constraints, and language features.