Benchmark: array vs float32array max

Script Preparation code:

function getRandomInt(max) {
  return Math.floor(Math.random() * Math.floor(max));
}
var a = [...Array(10000)].map(_ => Math.random(1000000));
var ta = (new Float32Array(10000)).map(_ => Math.random(1000000));

Tests:

array max apply
Math.max.apply(Math, a);
typedArray max apply
Math.max.apply(Math, ta);
array max
Math.max(...a);
typedArray max
Math.max(...ta);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
array max apply
typedArray max apply
array max
typedArray max

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 126 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
array max apply	102101.3 Ops/sec
typedArray max apply	3769.0 Ops/sec
array max	15071.9 Ops/sec
typedArray max	2160.2 Ops/sec

array vs float32array max (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: array max apply vs typedArray max apply vs array max vs typedArray max

Created: 2 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

array max apply

typedArray max apply

array max

typedArray max

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A