var ops = [true, 1, false, 3, 4, 5, true, "foobar", {}, 3, 4, 5, 6, [], false, 2, true, 2, false, 212, true, 34, 1, 1.909090090909009090909090909, undefined];
ops.filter(op => op === null)
ops.filter(op => !op)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
null check | |
negation check |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
null check | 22565376.0 Ops/sec |
negation check | 14641786.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to measure the performance difference between two approaches for filtering an array in JavaScript: using null
checks and using negation (!
) operators.
Options Compared
There are two options being compared:
=== null
operator to check if an element is null
. It's likely that this option will use a loop or recursion to iterate through the array and perform the null check.!
operator to negate the value of each element, effectively checking for falsiness instead of nullity. It may also use loops or other methods to iterate through the array.Pros and Cons
null
values will be considered falsy).Library and Purpose
In this benchmark, no specific JavaScript library is being used. The code snippet provided only contains a simple array of operations (ops
) that needs to be filtered.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There's no special feature or syntax mentioned in the benchmark definition or test cases. However, it's worth noting that null
checks and negation are basic JavaScript concepts that are widely supported across most browsers and environments.
Other Alternatives
If you'd like to explore alternative approaches for filtering arrays, here are a few options:
Array.prototype.filter()
with an arrow function: ops.filter(op => op === null)
. This approach is concise and efficient but may have performance implications depending on the browser or environment.Array.prototype.every()
with a callback function: ops.every((op, index) => op === null)
. This approach is less common for filtering arrays but can be more readable in certain cases.& 0
to check for zero): ops.filter(op => op & 0 === 0)
. This approach might provide performance benefits, but its readability and maintainability may suffer.In summary, the benchmark compares two approaches for filtering an array in JavaScript: using null
checks and using negation (!
) operators. The choice between these options depends on your specific use case and priorities (e.g., readability vs. performance).