Benchmark: compare boolean values v0.1

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var a = true;
var b = false;

Tests:

naive compare
const reuslt = (a === b ? 0 : a < b ? -1 : 1);
Number constructor
const result = Number(a) - Number(b);
lodash subtract
const result = _.subtract(a, b)
just subtract
const result = a - b;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
naive compare
Number constructor
lodash subtract
just subtract

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition is a set of instructions that defines how to create a test case. In this case, there are four different approaches to compare two boolean values (true and false):

1. `naive compare`: This approach uses a simple if-else statement to compare the two values.
2. `Number constructor`: This approach converts both boolean values to numbers using the `Number()` function and then subtracts them.
3. `lodash subtract`: This approach uses the `subtract` function from the Lodash library to perform the subtraction.
4. `just subtract`: This approach directly subtracts one value from another, without any intermediate steps.

**Options Compared**

The benchmark is comparing four different approaches to compare boolean values:

* `naive compare`
* `Number constructor`
* `lodash subtract`
* `just subtract`

These options are being compared in terms of their performance, which is likely the primary focus of the benchmark.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

Here's a brief overview of each approach:

1. `naive compare`:
	* Pros: Simple and straightforward.
	* Cons: May be slower due to the need for explicit comparisons.
2. `Number constructor`:
	* Pros: Can take advantage of implicit conversions in JavaScript, which can lead to faster performance.
	* Cons: May have unnecessary overhead if the converted numbers are not used immediately.
3. `lodash subtract`:
	* Pros: Leverages the optimized performance of a well-tested library like Lodash.
	* Cons: Adds an external dependency and may introduce additional overhead due to loading the library.
4. `just subtract`:
	* Pros: Avoids unnecessary conversions and uses the most direct approach.
	* Cons: May be slower than other approaches that can take advantage of implicit conversions.

**Library (Lodash)**

In this benchmark, Lodash is used as a dependency for the `lodash subtract` approach. The `subtract` function from Lodash is being used to perform the subtraction operation. This suggests that the developers want to leverage the optimized performance and testing of Lodash, but also want to be mindful of adding an external dependency.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

There doesn't appear to be any special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing different approaches to compare boolean values.

**Alternatives**

If you're interested in running a similar benchmark, here are some alternatives:

* You can use a similar framework like Benchmark.js or Microbenchmark to run the benchmarks.
* You can experiment with different languages and libraries to see if they provide better performance for this specific task.
* You can also try using more advanced techniques, such as memoization or caching, to optimize the comparison operations.

Overall, this benchmark provides a useful comparison of different approaches to comparing boolean values in JavaScript. By understanding the pros and cons of each approach, developers can make informed decisions about which method to use depending on their specific requirements.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/17.5 Safari/605.1.15

Browser/OS: Safari 17 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
naive compare	3437795.5 Ops/sec
Number constructor	2597060.0 Ops/sec
lodash subtract	3465897.8 Ops/sec
just subtract	6788205.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

compare boolean values v0.1 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: naive compare vs Number constructor vs lodash subtract vs just subtract

Created: 5 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

naive compare

Number constructor

lodash subtract

just subtract

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):