const i = 123456781235487945462131654987564647
i.toString()
`${i}`
"" + i;
String(i)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
toString | |
template literal | |
string literal concat | |
String() |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
toString | 62115832.0 Ops/sec |
template literal | 72365496.0 Ops/sec |
string literal concat | 59487740.0 Ops/sec |
String() | 54683016.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark measures the performance of converting an integer to a string in four different ways:
toString()
method${i}
)"" + i
)String()
constructorOptions Compared
The options are compared in terms of their execution speed, which is measured in executions per second.
Pros and Cons of Each Approach:
toString()
: This method is widely supported and efficient. However, it may involve more overhead due to the dynamic dispatch mechanism used by JavaScript.${i}
): Template literals are a relatively new feature in JavaScript that provides a concise way to create strings. They are likely to be faster than string concatenation but may incur some overhead due to the parsing and compilation required for this syntax."" + i
): This approach is simple and widely supported, but it can be slower than other methods due to the creation of intermediate strings.String()
constructor: Creating a new string using the String()
constructor involves more overhead compared to other approaches.Libraries and Special Features Used
There are no libraries used in this benchmark.
Special JS Feature/Syntax:
Template literals (the ${i}
syntax) are a special feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). They provide a concise way to create strings by interpolating variables into the string template. This syntax is not available in older versions of JavaScript and may be disabled in certain browsers.
Other Considerations
When comparing the performance of these approaches, it's essential to consider factors such as:
Alternatives
Other alternatives for converting integers to strings include:
Number()
function instead of toString()
: This can be a simpler alternative, but it may incur some overhead due to the dynamic dispatch mechanism used by JavaScript.In summary, this benchmark provides a useful insight into the relative performance of different approaches for converting integers to strings in JavaScript. By considering factors such as browser support, code readability, and consistency, developers can choose an approach that balances performance with maintainability.