var mySet = new Set();
// Generate and add 10,000 unique items to the set
for (let i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
mySet.add(i);
}
[mySet]
mySet.values()
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
[...] | |
Set.prototype.values() |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
[...] | 75898.0 Ops/sec |
Set.prototype.values() | 27722386.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON for the "Set array expansion" benchmark.
What is being tested?
The benchmark tests two different approaches to working with large sets in JavaScript:
[...mySet]
): This approach converts the Set
object into an array, allowing for indexing and iteration.values()
method of the Set
prototype: This approach returns a live view of the set's values as an iterable sequence.Options being compared
The benchmark compares the performance of these two approaches:
[...mySet]
values()
method of the Set
prototypePros and Cons of each approach:
[...mySet]
:values()
method of the Set
prototype:Set
prototype's methods.Library used
The benchmark uses the built-in Set
object and its values()
method, which is a part of the JavaScript standard library. No external libraries are required.
Special JS feature or syntax
This benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's already covered by the standard library (e.g., let
, const
, for
, etc.).
Other alternatives
If you're interested in exploring other approaches, here are a few examples:
values()
).Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be supported by all JavaScript engines or environments.