<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
var other = _.concat([1, 2], params);
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]
var other = [ 1, 2, params ]
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
var other = $.merge([1, 2], params);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Lodash concat | |
spread operator | |
jQuery merge |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Lodash concat | 1568973.1 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 4793406.0 Ops/sec |
jQuery merge | 1811784.9 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark compares two approaches for concatenating arrays: the traditional concat()
method, the new ES6 spread operator (...
), and jQuery's merge()
function. The goal is to determine which approach is faster.
Options Compared
concat()
: A popular utility library that provides a flexible way to concatenate arrays....
): A new syntax introduced in ECMAScript 2015, allowing for concise array creation and expansion.merge()
function: Part of the jQuery library, this function combines multiple arrays into one.Pros and Cons
concat()
:...
):merge()
function:Library and Purpose
concat()
.merge()
function: Part of the jQuery library, this function combines multiple arrays into one, often used for DOM manipulation and event handling.Special JS Feature or Syntax
The benchmark uses the ES6 spread operator (...
), which is a relatively new feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015. This syntax allows for concise array creation and expansion, making it easier to write code that creates arrays with merged data.
Alternative Approaches
Other approaches for concatenating arrays might include:
Array.prototype.push()
: Iteratively adding elements to an array using the push()
method.concat
function.These alternatives are not explicitly tested in the provided benchmark, but they could be explored to determine which approach is fastest and most efficient.